Not seeing the correct location?
  • Click the weather box above. A new browser tab (or window) should open and display the Accuweather website.
  • Type your zip code or City, State and press enter.
  • Select your town.
  • Close the Accuweather browser tab (or window).
Reload the Chronicle website and your location should be correct.
Close these instructions.

Mansfield relieved by state budget

By CLAIRE GALVIN

Chronicle Staff Writer

MANSFIELD — Town council members finally breathed a sigh of relief during their ongoing discussion of the state budget.

Connecticut recently approved a bipartisan budget that restores much of the funding cut to Mansfield in the fiscal year 2017-18 budget.

Interim Town Manager Maria Capriola and Finance Director Cherie Trahan explained Mansfield will experience a net increase of $458,488 in revenues for 2017-18.

The town will see a net decrease of $407,263 for fiscal year 2018-19.

Under Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s executive order, Mansfield was looking at a $14 million cut in state aid.

“At this point, I’m feeling an immense sense of relief and gratitude to Mansfield’s employees who lived through a time when nobody knew whether their job was secure or not,” said Democratic councilor Toni Moran.

Barring any unforeseen circumstances, Mansfield will be able to return to enacting the combined town/school budget of $52,923,476 voters approved at a town meeting at the end of May.

That budget increased spending by $ 1,299,566, or 2.5 percent over the 2016-17 budget.

The council voted 7-1 in favor of lifting the discretionary spending freeze, resuming the capital plan as adopted and approving transfers to the unassigned fund and general fund balances.

Republicans Virginia Raymond opposed and Mark Sargent was absent.

Raymond said she was opposed because the budget is still not balanced and cuts could still occur in coming years.

“This budget doesn’t solve anything, anymore than the budget that was passed by the Republicans,” Raymond said. “I think this would be the last point in time that we would let up any of our planning in terms of efficiencies or reductions.”

Other councilors discussed the problems that could occur by allowing discretionary spending, but ultimately approved the motion.

“As somebody who watches the budgets in my career as much as I do here, I know we’re not stable at a state level, and I know there’s probably more going to come at some point soon,” said unaffiliated councilor Denise Keane.

Trahan said discretionary spending includes professional development, travel expenses, conferences, extra program supplies and other things that are not required for licenses or certifications.

Capriola and Trahan said mid-year reductions or rescissions are still possible.

 

This article appears in our print edition and in our Chronicle e-edition (available at 4 p.m. weekdays, 8 a.m. Saturday) complete with all photos and special sections.

Click here to subscribe to the Chronicle E-edition

Click here to inquire about print subscriptions