By NOAM N. LEVEY
Tribune Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON â€” The Trump administration cleared
the way Thursday for states to impose work requirements on many Americans who depend on Medicaid, the mammoth government health insurance program for the poor.
The much-anticipated move â€” which was strongly condemned by patient advocates, physicians and consumer groups â€” would mark the first time in the programâ€™s half-century history the government will require people to work in exchange for health coverage. In states that decide to impose the new requirement, it is widely expected to shrink Medicaid rolls.
The new plan sets the stage for a potentially long and contentious legal battle over the shape and purpose of a health program more than 70 million Americans now depend on.
The administration outlined the work-requirement plan in a letter to state Medicaid officials that indicates the administrationâ€™s willingness to grant state requests to impose requirements on working-age, nondisabled Medicaid beneficiaries.
â€śMedicaid needs to be more flexible so that states can best address the needs of this population,â€ť said Seema Verma, who oversees the Medicare and Medicaid programs at the Department of Health and Human Services and has long called for putting new requirements on Medicaid patients, including charging them more for their care.
Many patient advocates note a small fraction of the people covered by Medicaid are of working age, nondisabled and currently unemployed. The main impact of the rules will be to subject poor people to stacks of paperwork that will drive some to drop coverage, the critics say.
â€śMedicaid was designed as a health care program, to provide vulnerable members of our society with access to care they badly need,â€ť said Dr. Jack Ende, president of the American College of Physicians.
â€śWork requirements impose an additional, unnecessary barrier to allowing patients access to vital health care services for people who need access and coverage the most. â€¦ We need to work together to find ways to improve the program, instead of restrict it.â€ť
Other groups criticizing the Trump administrationâ€™s plans included Public Citizen, Families USA and the advocacy arm of the American Cancer Society.
Several experts noted that threatening to strip coverage from poor people who are not working is inconsistent with the programâ€™s legal mission to improve health and therefore could be subject to challenge in court.
The administration is nonetheless expected to quickly approve requests from as many as 10 states, all but one of which has a Republican governor.
The states are: Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin.
Many other states, such as California, are not expected to impose work requirements.
Verma and other conservatives argue forcing working-age Medicaid beneficiaries to work or seek work â€” a strategy used for years in other federally funded aid programs for the poor â€” will improve their health.
â€śStates â€¦ want more flexibility to engage their working-age, able-bodied citizens on Medicaid,â€ť Verma told a gathering of state Medicaid directors in November. â€śThey want to develop programs that will help them break the chains of poverty and live up to their fullest potential. We support this.â€ť
Critics of the Trump ad-ministrationâ€™s approach note a growing body of evidence shows Medicaid health coverage is helping many Americans improve their health and their finances, not holding them back, as Verma and other have suggested.
A large majority of Medicaid recipients â€” almost two-thirds â€” are children, elderly or disabled. They will be exempt from the new requirements.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.